Işık, Oğuz and Pınarcıoğlu, M. Melih. Nöbetleşe
Yoksulluk: Gecekondulaşma ve Kent Yoksulları: Sultanbeyli Örneği. İstanbul:
İletişim, 2002, 368pp.
ABSTRACT
Bequeathing Poverty: Slums and the Urban Poor, the Case of
Sultanbeyli
Nöbetleşe Yoksulluk: Gecekondulaşma ve Kent Yoksulları: Sultanbeyli Örneği
This 368-page book is a
sociological study of a shanty town (gecekondu)
district in Istanbul, namely Sultanbeyli, in the late 1990s.
This work is an attempt to
understand the survival strategies of the urban poor in the face of the social,
economic and political transformations after 1980, based on a research project
undertaken in 1997 in Sultanbeyli.
The book engages in a
critical discussion with the literature on urbanisation and poverty. For
understanding the survival strategies of the poor the authors suggest the
concept of “bequeathing poverty”. This refers to the functioning principle of
socio-economic networks around urban rent and community relations that transfer
poverty from early settlers to the late comers, by means of upward mobility.
The authors use both qualitative and quantitative techniques to show how “bequeathing
poverty” functions in Sultanbeyli.
Işık and Pınarcıoğlu
discuss the dynamics of urbanisation in Turkey before and after 1980. They
emphasise the gradual urbanisation of the period before 1980, as opposed to the
tense and exclusive urbanisation model of the post 1980 period.
Thereafter the authors deal
with the history of urbanisation in Sultanbeyli. They use the aggregate data on
demographics, economic variables and political differentiation in Sultanbeyli
to illustrate the complicated structure of the district that defies the models
proposed by the existing literature. In the seventh chapter, based on the genuine
quantitative data on age groups, literacy, wealth, and income distribution, the
authors argue that the upper, middle and lower segments in Sultanbeyli are
formed on the basis of a particular combination of distribution of illegal
urban rent, property ownership and ethnic community affiliations.
The conclusion points to the
fact that segregation of communities on the basis of religion, ethnicity or
wealth creates a society where integration and progress becomes impossible.
The book is targeted to both
academic and non-academic audiences. Theory and empirical data is integrated in
a very efficient and effective way. At the end of the book there are maps of
data gathered in the field survey. There are also the field notes of the
authors presented in a scattered format throughout the book.
Overall, although this book
has fewer individual stories from Sultanbeyli than expected, it is a
breakthrough in urbanisation literature in Turkey as it places the urban poor’s
agency at the centre of the narrative.
Helin Burkay
Işık, Oğuz and Pınarcıoğlu, M. Melih. Nöbetleşe
Yoksulluk: Gecekondulaşma ve Kent Yoksulları: Sultanbeyli Örneği. İstanbul:
İletişim, 2002, 368pp.
ABSTRACT
Bequeathing Poverty: Slums and the Urban Poor, the Case of
Sultanbeyli
Nöbetleşe Yoksulluk: Gecekondulaşma ve Kent Yoksulları: Sultanbeyli Örneği
This 368-page book is a
sociological study of a shanty town (gecekondu)
district in Istanbul, namely Sultanbeyli, in the late 1990s.
This work is an attempt to
understand the survival strategies of the urban poor in the face of the social,
economic and political transformations after 1980, based on a research project
undertaken in 1997 in Sultanbeyli.
The book engages in a
critical discussion with the literature on urbanisation and poverty. For
understanding the survival strategies of the poor the authors suggest the
concept of “bequeathing poverty”. This refers to the functioning principle of
socio-economic networks around urban rent and community relations that transfer
poverty from early settlers to the late comers, by means of upward mobility.
The authors use both qualitative and quantitative techniques to show how “bequeathing
poverty” functions in Sultanbeyli.
Işık and Pınarcıoğlu
discuss the dynamics of urbanisation in Turkey before and after 1980. They
emphasise the gradual urbanisation of the period before 1980, as opposed to the
tense and exclusive urbanisation model of the post 1980 period.
Thereafter the authors deal
with the history of urbanisation in Sultanbeyli. They use the aggregate data on
demographics, economic variables and political differentiation in Sultanbeyli
to illustrate the complicated structure of the district that defies the models
proposed by the existing literature. In the seventh chapter, based on the genuine
quantitative data on age groups, literacy, wealth, and income distribution, the
authors argue that the upper, middle and lower segments in Sultanbeyli are
formed on the basis of a particular combination of distribution of illegal
urban rent, property ownership and ethnic community affiliations.
The conclusion points to the
fact that segregation of communities on the basis of religion, ethnicity or
wealth creates a society where integration and progress becomes impossible.
The book is targeted to both
academic and non-academic audiences. Theory and empirical data is integrated in
a very efficient and effective way. At the end of the book there are maps of
data gathered in the field survey. There are also the field notes of the
authors presented in a scattered format throughout the book.
Overall, although this book
has fewer individual stories from Sultanbeyli than expected, it is a
breakthrough in urbanisation literature in Turkey as it places the urban poor’s
agency at the centre of the narrative.
Helin Burkay